<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Republican Party of the Virgin Islands - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-67361219" type="application/json"/><link>http://vigop.disqus.com/</link><description>Website of the Territorial Committee of the United States Virgin Islands Republican Party</description><atom:link href="http://vigop.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 05:19:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-476297726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and have my children check up here often. I am quite sure they will learn lots of new stuff here than anybody else!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">outsourcing website</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 05:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-470681738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What does this mean. It is UNintelligible.&lt;br&gt;Are you out to deceive - please explain in simple terms&lt;br&gt; Was Ron Paul supposed to get more delegates than he did? ?? ???  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karelrei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:00:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-467385160</link><description>&lt;p&gt; No, a lot of us are libertarians just not Libertarians.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Faulk</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-466629749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha!  Well, good thing I had a pic of this page before they changed it.  This site has removed the caucus results which were:Ron Paul wins with 29%; Romney second with 26%Took a few days (a little slower than the msm) to catch up to the lying game... Must not be that many people coming to this site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jennifer_wheeler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:23:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-465594842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol? Libertarians aren't republicans? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Goldwater, Reagan, Taft, Eisenhower, Pat Buchanan, Gary Johnson (REPUBLICAN governor of NM)....aren't *real* republicans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You people have trashed our once great party. Us libertarians are trying to revive this party and you obviously refuse to acknowledge and welcome new comers. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">westernskier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:16:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-465589434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your system is bogus and is a farce. It thumbs its nose up at all ethical and honest freedom loving people. You are a disgrace. You and your chicken sh#t political party and system reeks of corruption and cheating. May Romney and your group go down in history as the largest corrupt voter scandals of all time. Kids even know that if you have to cheat to win it is not really wining but rather outright lying cheating stealing and dishonesty. Prisons were made for your kind. Each night I hope and pray that this charade of an election process put on by the GOP is brought to light and as we know evil does not like the light. In the end you will all lose. Do not cry when you are found out and the country turns on you and all that support you.&lt;br&gt;LONG LIVE RON PAUL AND THE REVOLUTION AND WE WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER YOUR CORRUPT SYSTEM AND HOW IT TRIED TO SILENCE FREEDOM&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Russ Nelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:08:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-465549008</link><description>&lt;p&gt; If there was no popular vote (Straw Poll) which isn't true and was posted on this website, if people exclusively voted for the delegates how would the party construct the initially posted tally and how would Romney take away the delegates when people voted for Ron Paul's delegates in majority? &lt;br&gt;Charles you represent the most typical stereotype. Lying and attacking. You might even believe what you are saying and for the party's sake I wish you were right but you are simply wrong because I spoke with an GOP official today who told me they removed the tally because it was a meaningless straw poll. Iowa in example was just another meaningless straw poll but you remember the fuzz about it. Ron Paul won the popular vote (straw poll) and for that matter he has bragging rights. This is why these polls are called beauty contests and this is why you are wrong on the subject.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Frey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2012 GOP PARTY CAUCUS&amp;#8212;CANDIDATES AND BALLOTS</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012-gop-party-caucus-candidates-and-ballots/#comment-465185604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's Mitt Romney will never be president. No matter how much his friends at Goldman Sachs delute the dollar for his campaign. Ron Paul has already won. It will be Obama or Ron Paul never Romney. Go to &lt;a href="http://ronpaulflix.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ronpaulflix.com/&lt;/a&gt; and hear the truth for yourself, not processed through the bought media propaganda machine. listen to this &lt;a href="http://ronpaulflix.com/2012/03/josh-tolley-ron-paul-is-going-to-win-mar-12-2012/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ronpaulflix.com/2012/03...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wwhaas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464953618</link><description>&lt;p&gt; He won Virgin Islands and Maine, Virgin Islands removed the tally and Maine didn't count the votes of all counties. Ron Paul is a repuplican, it is the party the went through a metamorphosis not the candidate.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Frey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464952712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have removed the popular vote tally!!! &lt;br&gt;You bowed to the GOP Establishment who want Ron Paul out of the picture.&lt;br&gt;You have kicked Democracy in the face.&lt;br&gt;Dear GOP manipulators... we will not vote for your puppet we will write in Ron Paul and destroy your party. You cannot win without the young vote and you cannot survive with fresh blood. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Frey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:15:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464668578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, great!! Now the Ron Paul spammers get started. :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:10:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2012 GOP PARTY CAUCUS&amp;#8212;CANDIDATES AND BALLOTS</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012-gop-party-caucus-candidates-and-ballots/#comment-464646338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Go to Americans Elect, an online alternative, and support Dr. Paul.  He will be on the national ballot with them if he gets 1,000 supporters from each of 10 states.  We can make it happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dianna Suarez</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:33:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464639250</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh... I'll give this one more try. The VI GOP was neither wrong nor did they lie... but, the DID manage to confuse the daylights out of a lot of people.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Those percentages were a cumulative breakdown of all votes each pledged potential delegate received. Since voters can choose up to six delegates (for any reason they wish, friend, neighbor, etc.) considering it a "popular vote" is highly erroneous.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Those numbers and percentages had as little meaning as what color shoes the potential delegates were wearing... black shoes vs brown shoes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I really do understand how people were confused by those numbers and the VI GOP never should have posted them. All they managed to do was create the wrong perception and provide information that, on a cursory examination, led several bloggers (and others) to a false and completely mistaken conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. There was NO popular vote.&lt;br&gt;2. Votes were cast for potential delegates ONLY.&lt;br&gt;2. No republican candidate received ANY votes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464624364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Listen here, and it will explain how this can happen... &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU2AvSwzuok" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Travis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:56:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464623744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ron Paul is setting himself up for Victory... even if he is NOT the republican nominee. Dr. Ron Paul supporters follow Dr. Paul, and his principles. He could switch at the last minute to 3rd party, taking a HUGE chunk of republicans with him. Not only that, but think about all the democrats that hate Obama, but will not vote for a republican... With Dr. Paul on a 3rd party ticket, there would be another option other than the lesser of two evils... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Travis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464609535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said Miss B. Obviously some other mainstream media outlets saw it as well. &lt;a href="http://rt.com/usa/news/ron-paul-media-virgin-395/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://rt.com/usa/news/ron-pau...&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/mar/12/ron-paul-finally-wins-one-sort/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.washingtontimes.com...&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/11154-ron-paul-wins-popular-vote-in-virgin-islands-gop-caucus" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thenewamerican.com/...&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href="http://www.whnt.com/news/whnt-ron-paul-wins-virgin-island-caucus-mitt-romney-gets-most-delegates-20120311,0,2341164.story" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.whnt.com/news/whnt-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackie1968</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464603360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually...that's odd....if there was no such thing, why was it posted Paul 29% and Romeny 26%? Are you saying the VI GOP got it wrong or lied then? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackie1968</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:22:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464597069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pathetic VI!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackie1968</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:12:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464597066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, yes. A standard Ron Paul supporter response: "Agree with us or DIE!!!".&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And you seriously wonder why Ron Paul and his supporters are considered wackos? In case you don't know the answer... its because you ARE a bunch of wackos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:12:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464594498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The only thing at which you should feel shame is your mental acumen. There was NO "popular vote". Nobody won the "popular vote" because there WAS no "popular vote".&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you can be so easily confused by a few compiled (and meaningless numbers) your candidate has no business winning anything.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ron Paul supporters seem to love calling everyone else stupid and cheats. This is just more evidence that they are the ones who are mentally challenged. Trying to explain the very simple and easy to understand results of the VI caucus are pointless. Its like trying to reason with a three year old... I give up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:08:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464589584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where is the popular vote saying Ron Paul won? I was BORN in St Thomas and SO proud of my people being the only spot thus far get it right, then you shame me with this blatant removal. You should be ashamed. I AM.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackie1968</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:00:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464367434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My goodness, you people are obtuse. There was NO popular vote!!! Trying to spin  this as a "popular vote" win is just ludicrous and another notch to be added to the "Ron Paul is Wacko" totem pole.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To make matters worse Ron Paul, his campaign staff, his supporters and some bloggers have this information wrong and are presenting this nonsense as truth. Again, there was NO "popular vote" in the VI caucus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If Ron Paul and his people cannot understand the very simple VI caucus voting... and keep fixating on meaningless numbers... any notions that he has a plan to fix the economy is doomed. If he cannot understand the results from the VI he cannot understand how to handle a budget.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:30:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464289575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the popular vote as copied from the Virgin Islands website before it was removed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;br&gt;Ron Paul appears to have won the popular vote in the Virgin Islands!&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I took this right off the Virgin Island GOP website:  &lt;a href="http://vigop.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://vigop.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Percentages384 total cast112 to Paul (29%)  Won one delegate101 to Romney (26%) Won three delegates plus three RNC  member pledge.  (Pick up a uncommitted delegate after the balloting for a total of seven.)23 to Santorm (6%) No delegates18 to Gingrich (5%) No delegates130 Uncommitted (34%) Two delegates but one changed to Romney after the vote totals were announced&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Miss B</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464196996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you can take away a vote percentage after it has been reported and then say that there was no vote percentage, but that isn't going to help us figure out where that 29% came from in the first place.  &lt;br&gt;Apparently, there was a way to figure this out that gave Dr. Paul 29% of the vote.  Now, I don't know how you've wiggled out of this, but you have and it smells REALLY BAD&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">openyoureyes2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:52:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VI GOP 2012 Caucus Results After Ballot Verification of Challenged Ballots (Unofficial)</title><link>http://vigop.com/2012/03/vi-gop-2012-caucus-results-coming-soon/#comment-464180745</link><description>&lt;p&gt; You didn't read what i wrote then.  I clearly stated that the people who were at the caucus voted for the delegates.  Did you decide to respond to me before even reading my entire post?  Seriously.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:28:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
